the cost of life in prison without parole is much cheaper then the cost of the death penalty, but this, like their charge of bias, is also untrue. Moreover, it can be an important tool in deterring of crime. If the thief should be imprisoned, the murder must be buried in the ground. Questions like, who really suffers when the convict is killed is it him or his family? It is obvious that food for criminal costs more than a bullet or a electricity charge, but by using criminal labor government can completely pay it off or even earn some money. It is, undoubtedly, dangerous, as opponents say, to give such instrument as death penalty in Government hands. Should the death penalty be given to minors? This cost even more money. Killing is not justice! The death penalty has not always been practiced in the United States; however, there have been about 13,000 people who have been legally executed since colonial times.
The real prisoners, who could be rehabilitated, will not have the chance because with more prisoners in rehab, they will not get the right amount of attention. It can lead to political murders with no guilt of accused at all.
Of course, it will not help to return the victim but it will be easier for everyone if the murder is also killed. Would they rejoice or celebrate? Theodore Robert Bundy is a famous American serial killer, rapist, kidnapper, and necrophile. One of the first recorded uses of the death plenty occurred in 16th Century Bc Egypt. The death penalty is certainly a deterrent, restriction. . I would much rather risk the former. They have have commit a hideous crime, it doesn't mean that we have to hurt them or kill them also.
Death, penalty, argumentative, essay
Queen mary literary essay conference, Ap biology essay 2004b, Media racism essay, Pokhara essay,